09 December 2015 | World Wildlife Fund UK News Release
New data from IUCN, Climate Advisers and WWF reveals the huge potential that more effective and ambitious forest conservation and restoration could make in the fight to combat climate change.
If just 12 forest countries, including Brazil and Indonesia, meet their existing forest goals this would cut annual global climate emissions by 3.5 gigatonnes in 2020 – equivalent to the total annual emissions from India and Australia put together.
With additional ambition to achieve near zero forest loss by 2020 on top of existing goals, these countries could save nearly 5 gigatonnes a year in 2020 – equivalent to the emissions of the entire EU.
Will Ashley-Cantello, Chief Adviser on Forests at WWF said:
“It is clear from the pledges currently on the table in Paris that more emissions savings are needed to avoid dangerous climate change. New partnerships to conserve forests – which come with huge environmental, economic and social benefits – could be the answer.
“It’s therefore vital that the climate finance pledges and the final Paris agreement give forest nations the necessary long-term support to press ahead with, and extend, their conservation and restoration plans.
”Recently we’ve seen exciting new partnerships announced to work together to reduce deforestation, like Colombia’s deal with the governments of UK, Norway and Germany. But more partnerships between forest nations, donor nations, and businesses are needed to raise ambition and deliver targets earlier.”
In the run up to the Paris climate change talks, dozens of countries included action on forests in the national plans they submitted – known as Intended Nationally Determined Contributions. Today’s report analyses the targets of 12 countries – Brazil, Colombia, Democratic Republic of Congo, Ethiopia, Ghana, Guatemala, Indonesia, Mexico, Nepal, Paraguay, Peru, Tanzania – that are home to nearly half the world’s tropical forests.
Michael Wolosin, Managing Director of Research and Policy, Climate Advisers and a co-author of the analysis said:
“Forests illustrate a key point: that developing countries are willing to do more than their fair share if they get help. The Paris agreement needs to be designed in a way that advances these partnerships. First and foremost, that means an ambitious agreement with updates every five years. But it also means an approach to mitigation finance that focuses on the outcome – tons of emissions – rather than just dollars.”
The vital role of local and regional action to protect forests was further highlighted this week as WWF welcomed plans by the state government of Acre, in the Brazilian Amazon, to create a new 155,000 ha protected area in 2016. This will add to the system of protected areas and indigenous lands in Acre that already cover almost 50% of the state’s territory. The news comes at a time when the creation of new protected areas in the Amazon by the Brazilian national government has all but ground to a halt, and illustrates how forward-looking regional administrations can drive progress at sub-national level.
WWF’s Sky Rainforest Rescue project manager Sarah Hutchison said:
“Acre’s government clearly understands that only with the coordinated action between state and national agencies can the state conserve its irreplaceable forest, the vast diversity of species and the essential ecosystem services it supports. In taking bold conservation measures now, it shows the way for local and regional administrations around the world.”
At the Paris climate talks on the 7th December, the states of Acre, Mato Grosso and Brazil’s national Environment Ministry announced their ambition to join forces to eliminate all illegal deforestation in these two Amazonian states by 2020, an ambition that Acre’s Governor Tiao Viana would like to achieve even earlier, in just three years’ time.
The need for more ambitious action on forests is clear, given that countries at the Paris talks are increasingly considering an overall goal of limiting average global temperature rise to 1.5C. The existing UN goal of keeping the temperature rise to below 2C already presents a major challenge – with estimates suggesting that current pledges would still lead to a 2.7C rise by end of the century.
If achieved, the deforestation reduction and restoration goals of the 12 countries studied would save an area of forest more than twice the size of Spain between now and 2030 (108 million hectares). Additional ambition to bring deforestation to near zero by 2020 would expand the forest area saved to nearly two Spains plus France (160 million hectares). This would help protect global biodiversity and benefit the hundreds of millions of people, including many of the world’s poorest, who depend on forests.
Previous research – for example the Stern review and more recently the New Climate Economy reports – has shown that not only is protecting forests and restoring forest landscapes cost-effective but it has strong economic benefits.
Notes to editors:
1. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change estimates that the land sector could provide 20-60 per cent of cumulative climate mitigation by 2030.
2. This report is a consultation draft with initial results. It is available at www.wwf.org.uk/theforestopportunity The full technical report will be published in 2016.
3. In 2020, action in 12 tropical forest countries could reduce annual global emissions by 4.8 GtCO2 – roughly equivalent to the combined national emissions of India, Japan, and Australia. Most of that (3.5 GtCO2) would come from existing deforestation reduction and restoration targets and pledges, with much of it conditional on appropriate international finance. A further 1.3 GtCO2 would be possible if international partnerships raised ambition to bring deforestation to near zero by 2020 as targeted in the UN Sustainable Development Goals.
4. In 2030, the total mitigation potential of the forest sector in these 12 countries is 4.2 GtCO2 – roughly equivalent to the EU’s total annual emissions. On the table with national targets and plans is a reduction of 3.3 GtCO2 through avoided deforestation and restoration with international support. The remaining 0.9 GtCO2 could be achieved if international partnerships helped these 12 countries achieve near zero forest loss by 2030.
5. Since 2009 WWF and Sky have partnered on an initiative called Sky Rainforest Rescue to help save one billion trees in Acre state. The new protected area, between the towns of Feijo and Manoel Urbano, is at the heart of the Sky Rainforest Rescue project area. It would provide an additional level of protection to the forests in this region, helping safeguard the project’s legacy.
6. Legislation that is currently being discussed in the Brazilian parliament (the PEC215) could undermine existing federal protected areas and indigenous lands across the country, and make new ones almost impossible to establish at the national level. This highlights the significance of the Acre state commitment.
7. Acre state has been punching above its weight in terms of valuing its ecosystem services and developing a jurisdictional REDD+ system (known as the SISA) for a number of years now. The question now is how Brazil will structure financing for REDD+ and sustainable landscape approaches in a way that supports state-level action and the sharing of benefits to communities living in and conserving the rainforest. The Brazilian government published its REDD+ strategy recently, and we can expect more details to emerge soon on how international funds will be channelled.
Oliver Fry | Political Media Relations Manager
T: | M: wwf.org.uk
For more information about endangered species go to Bagheera.com
Find organizations saving endangered species at Saving Endangered Species.com
For more information about endangered tigers go to Tigers In Crisis.com
Find organizations saving endangered tigers at Saving Endangered Tigers.com